法院审理查明,尽管被告上海易某网络科技有限公司通过AI技术修改了人物面部特征,但新生成视频的构图、场景、人物造型、创意表达等核心元素仍保留了原作的独创性。对此,法官认为,尽管这些修改过的视频不一定侵犯肖像权,但是被告系通过AI算法将原始视频进行局部替换合成,二者构成实质性相似。After her husband is devastated by a tragic accident, a devoted wife obsesses over a mysterious portrait that resembles him as he was; but when it starts to terrorize her, she must decide if it's possessed or if she's losing her mind. 法院审理查明,尽管被告上海易某网络科技有限公司通过AI技术修改了人物面部特征,但新生成视频的构图、场景、人物造型、创意表达等核心元素仍保留了原作的独创性。对此,法官认为,尽管这些修改过的视频不一定侵犯肖像权,但是被告系通过AI算法将原始视频进行局部替换合成,二者构成实质性相似。After her husband is devastated by a tragic accident, a devoted wife obsesses over a mysterious portrait that resembles him as he was; but when it starts to terrorize her, she must decide if it's possessed or if she's losing her mind.致命肖像详情